Thank. I tried exclusions)) But part of the  integration tests were red. 
And I has accused guice, and not on update bonecp 0.8.0-rc3)))

четверг, 17 октября 2013 г., 1:01:17 UTC+3 пользователь Stuart McCulloch 
написал:
>
> Yes that should really be an optional dependency, since it is jarjar'd 
> into the final jar - for the moment you can exclude it as follows:
>
>       <dependency>
>         <groupId>com.google.inject</groupId>
>         <artifactId>guice</artifactId>
>         <version>4.0-beta</version>
>         <exclusions>
>           <exclusion>
>             <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
>             <artifactId>guava</artifactId>
>           </exclusion>
>         </exclusions>
>       </dependency>
>
> Although personally I think Guava should be promoted to a direct 
> dependency as it makes the build and distribution much simpler:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=709
>
> (in the old 3.0 release the Guava code was manually copied into the source 
> tree which is why it never appeared as a dependency)
>
> On 16 Oct 2013, at 15:00, Peter Reilly wrote:
>
> The pom file has a (needless) dependence on guava/11.0.1. (along with
> a pile of other stuff). So
> folks that use pom based dependence to get guice (maven, ivy, buildr 
> others)
> pick up this have to take counter measures.  
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Stuart McCulloch 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Guice 4.0-beta embeds a subset of Guava under a different package, so you 
>> shouldn't see any classpath conflicts.
>>
>> How are you consuming Guice?  Are you assembling the jars yourself or 
>> using something like Maven or Ivy?
>>
>> PS. Guice trunk can now compile against Guava 15: 
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=769
>>
>> On 16 Oct 2013, at 08:39, Valerij Erakov wrote:
>>
>> Do you plan to migrate to guava 15? In transition on version 4-Beta 
>> appeared jar hell (using guava 15 and guice)
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "google-guice" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to