Hi Sam and Stuart,

    I got up to this point:

    @Inject
    public DepartmentsResource(Injector injector, UriInfo uriInfo)

When I try injecting the above constructor, Guice recognizes @javax.inject.Inject and com.google.Injector but doesn't recognize UriInfo. The problem is that UriInfo is not defined in any Guice module, nor can it be, because only Jersey knows how to inject this type and Jersey only speaks to HK2. TypeListener.hear() is never invoked for UriInfo so I have no way of providing Guice with the instance to be injected.

I am having a very hard time here. What's even more frustrating is that Spring has a working HK2 bridge so there is less pressure on HK2/Jersey to make this work. Any ideas?

Gili


On 27/10/2013 1:14 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 27 Oct 2013, at 15:59, cowwoc wrote:

What happens if I take https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/CustomInjections and change:

field.isAnnotationPresent(InjectLogger.class)

    to

field.isAnnotationPresent(Inject.class)

    Wouldn't that work as I expect?

I don't believe so, because Guice will report the missing binding as an error before it gets round to starting custom injection.

The only way I've found to provide a kind of "auto-binding" without modifying Guice internals is to use the SPI to scan for missing dependencies and then add bindings for them.

For example:

Guice.createInjector( new WireModule( appModuleA, appModuleB, serviceModuleC ) );

where WireModule uses Elements.elements(...) to process, analyze, and reapply the various elements - keeping track of what dependencies are used and what keys are bound.

The downside of this approach is that you need to remember wrap the WireModule around your application modules, as well as the up-front cost of analyzing the elements. It also doesn't work so well with just-in-time bindings (such as asking the injector for an instance of FooImpl.class, where FooImpl is not referenced at all in the bindings provided to the injector and therefore was not available for analysis).

The benefit of doing the analysis upfront is that the final binding elements are static and can be analyzed by tooling just like those from any other module.

Gili

On 27/10/2013 11:53 AM, Sam Berlin wrote:
Issue 49 <https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=49> provides a good history of this request -- currently closed as "Won't Fix".

 sam


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:45 AM, cowwoc <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Sam,

        Out of curiosity, is it possible to make this work using
    @Inject instead of @InjectLogger? As in:

    @Inject Logger logger;

        The goal is to intercept @Inject for an unknown type, and
    ask HK2 to try injection. Using custom annotations kind of
    defeat the purpose (we already have @HK2Inject which we're
    trying to get away from).

    Gili


    On 27/10/2013 11:24 AM, Sam Berlin wrote:
    There's no built-in way to do this.  Depending on the scope,
    it's maybe possible to use TypeListeners and custom injections
    <https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/CustomInjections>
    to do this.

     sam


    On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Gili <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I am trying to integrate two DI systems: Guice and HK2. I'd
        like to implement the following behavior:

        1. When Injector.getInstance() is invoked, iterate through
        all bindings (as it normally does).
        2. If no match is found, ask HK2 to inject the type.
        3. If no match is found, throw an error.

        I'm not sure how to implement step #2. Because we lack this
        behavior, we're stuck with an ugly @HK2Inject as seen here:
        https://hk2.java.net/guice-bridge/index.html

        Any ideas?

        Gili
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "google-guice" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
        from it, send an email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:google-guice%[email protected]>.
        To post to this group, send email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        Visit this group at
        http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
        For more options, visit
        https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic
    in the Google Groups "google-guice" group.
    To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/YXJuAdw5G24/unsubscribe.
    To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an
    email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.

    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "google-guice" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
    it, send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:google-guice%[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/YXJuAdw5G24/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/YXJuAdw5G24/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to