I am attempting to update a legacy Guice application, and I was wondering
if there is any sort of preferred way of doing things when taking Servlet
3.0 annotations into consideration. For example, my application has a
filter, FooFilter, which is defined in the Guice Module Factory method
configureServlets(), as follows:
Map<String, String> fooParams = new HashMap<String, String>();
fooParams.put("someParam", "parameter information");
filter("/foo.jsp","/foo/*").through(com.example.filter.FooFilter.class,
fooParams);
Is the above binding still necessary, or will it interfere with the
following using the @WebFilter Servlet 3.0 annotation:
@Singleton
@WebFilter(
filterName="FooFilter",
urlPatterns={"/foo.jsp", "/foo/*"},
initParams = {
@WebInitParam(name="foo", value="Hello "),
@WebInitParam(name="bar", value=" World!")
})
public class FooFilter implements Filter {
etc....
Which method is now preferred? Will they mess with each other?
If you are a StackOverflow user, you can collect a bounty here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19872236/servlet-3-0-annotations-in-conjuction-with-guice
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
