Thanks for your inputs. Basically, One injector for the all application is not always possible.
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 8:43:18 AM UTC+2, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > I'm not sure, whether I get you right. But to me this sounds like a > situation where I would create child injectors and somehow make sure that > they are accessible. For example, in a web application, I might create a > parent injector for the whole web application. And, for any HTTP Request, I > might create a child injector with request specific data (a database > transaction comes to mind) and store that in a ThreadLocal. > > OTOH, my example might interfere a lot with scopes. But, to be honest: I > never really understood what scopes are good for. > > Jochen > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/1fbcdd1d-5d83-4f85-88fd-b3e035b86a56%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
