Hi James,
There is http://stackoverflow.com/a/25348422/14731 but I have not tried
it myself. I originally invested a lot of time in trying to get this to
work but ended up with https://bitbucket.org/cowwoc/pouch/ because it
was a better fit for me. Pouch is like Dagger-lite, IoC without the
automated code generation... Surprisingly, this turned out to be rather
trivial to implement and all the debugging/configuring headaches totally
went away (I get sane stack-traces now). This also has a nice
side-effect of being very efficient at runtime.
Please let me know if you try out the Squarespace project. I am
especially interested in knowing whether it is possible to use
construction injection of HK2 types into Guice-injected types (e.g.
UriInfo into MyService) and vice versa (MyService into Jersey-injected
resource constructors).
Good luck,
Gili
On 09/09/2014 2:59 AM, jwtodd wrote:
hey gili, et al -
i'm a long time guice fan and have used a clean jetty/jersey/jackson
stack for years.
well, jersey2 is here and i am just now discovering these sticky
wicket issues.
on one hand, i am relieved in this thread as it expresses my
concerns/hopes perfectly.
on the other hand, i am bummed it is a dated thread yet surfaces quite
high in my google searches :|
i also found the hk2-guice bridge i plan to try out
: https://hk2.java.net/2.3.0-b03/guice-bridge.html
question: is this the optimal path forward, at this point in time?
again, i am really happy to find this thread and the individuals
participating, namely gili.
fully disclosure, one day i hope to try out dagger ... but that is for
another day and entirely bonus.
best,
- james
On Monday, October 28, 2013 4:29:11 PM UTC-7, Gili wrote:
The only way we're going to see this fixed is if Guice users
voice their opinion on the Jersey mailing list. Part of the
problem is that only 2-3 users have voiced their concerns on the
mailing list (in spite of the bug tracker showing almost 20
votes). If the Jersey committers understand that this is a
high-priority concern that affects many users they will prioritize
accordingly.
The author of HK2 has been very helpful but I suspect that the
problem will need to be fixed in Jersey, not HK2, and I haven't
received a single response from the Jersey team.
Gili
On 28/10/2013 1:43 PM, Shane Witbeck wrote:
I've been struggling with this as well using the guice-bridge.
Looks like there's been some churning over this topic:
http://markmail.org/message/k2jhr4y7uje6oijq#query:+page:1+mid:anfmm4jxnpoiqisd+state:results
<http://markmail.org/message/k2jhr4y7uje6oijq#query:+page:1+mid:anfmm4jxnpoiqisd+state:results>
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:57:23 AM UTC-7, Gili wrote:
On 25/09/2013 11:09 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> On 25/09/2013 9:45 PM, Marshall Pierce wrote:
>> On 09/25/2013 07:38 AM, Gili wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I authored Guice integration for Jersey 1.0 a few years
ago but times
>>> have changed and I no longer have as much free time as I
used to.
>>> Jersey
>>> 2.0 is out, with Spring support but Guice support is
nowhere in sight:
>>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-1950
<https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-1950>
>>>
>>> I tried applying pressure on the Jersey authors but got
no response at
>>> all. Is anyone able to help out by picking up this issue
and running
>>> with it? For everyone else, I would appreciate your vote
for this
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Gili
>>
>> I'm definitely interested in Guice support for Jersey 2. I
don't have
>> a lot of free time, but I'm happy to help how I can. The
lack of
>> Guice support is one of the few issues preventing me from
adopting
>> Jersey 2.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
> Hi Marshall,
>
>
> In theory we should be able to leverage
javax.inject.Inject to
> provide a consistent implementation for all compliant
injectors. In
> practice, it's not that simple. The devil in the details is
GuiceFilter.
>
> The problem is that HK2 requires us to construct a
> ServletContainer to get a ServiceLocator, then pass that
into the
> HK2-Guice bridge and get back an Injector. In the flip
side, Guice
> wants us to construct GuiceFilter to get an Injector, and
use it to
> inject ServletContainer. Each framework assumes it comes
first. It's
> not clear how they solved this problem for Spring, but my
guess is
> they don't have the equivalent of GuiceFilter.
>
> When I implemented Guice integration for Jersey 1.0,
the first
> thing I did was examine the Spring implementation. I
suggest we begin
> by doing the same here. I'll try to take a look over the
next two
> days. Please try to do the same on your end.
>
> PS: The lack of Guice support is also one of the few issues
preventing
> me from adopting Jersey 2.
>
> Thanks,
> Gili
Hi Again,
So it turns out I don't have a working solution for
Guice <-> HK2
after all. Have you made any progress on your end?
Gili
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic
in the Google Groups "google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/Qrai0osMCzI/unsubscribe
<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/Qrai0osMCzI/unsubscribe>.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
to [email protected] <javascript:>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<javascript:>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice
<http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/Qrai0osMCzI/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/63dac086-9abc-44aa-ab40-1759497c2688%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/63dac086-9abc-44aa-ab40-1759497c2688%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/540EEA51.6090206%40bbs.darktech.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
