Guice 4 has BoundFieldModule <https://github.com/google/guice/blob/master/extensions/testlib/src/com/google/inject/testing/fieldbinder/BoundFieldModule.java> which easily lets you create a module from a test case.
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 16:32:47 UTC-4, Maatary Okouya wrote: > > By injector for those test you mean a module where you bind mocks right ? > Actually i did something similar. I just did not like to have my production > module and test module all in the same place. This is because again, i do > package by feature in my test src. So i guess in my case overriding to > create the same effect should be fine. Such as overriding in a fixture of a > test. > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Stephan Classen <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> In these kind of situations I usually create an injector specifically >> for this test (or group of tests) and bind only the required classes >> (mostly mocks and rarely an actual class). >> Frameworks like juktio help a lot in cutting down the boiler plate code >> when creating specific injectors for tests >> >> >> >> On 08/21/2014 10:10 PM, Maatary Okouya wrote: >> >> Well, >> >> when you use mock, you might want to verify communication with the mock >> object. So you need to bind to a mock to do that. If you want a fake, >> because the original object is just to heavy for the test, then you need to >> change the binding to. You might well envision a class that needs to or >> three other service to perform its work. sometimes you wants to verify how >> it interact with one or all the services or you ust want to know the result >> when one of the service in actually used. >> >> Those are the case that i faced few time. >> >> In any case, many thanks for the inputs. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Stephan Classen <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> I dont think it is wrong to use it. But I don't see a need for it. >>> >>> If you are unit testing then you want only those bindings in your >>> injector which are required for the test. Hence no need to override >>> anything. >>> If you are doing integration test then you want to have actual code >>> executed and no mocks. Again no need to override anything. >>> >>> But there is nothing wrong with the overriding capabilities in guice. >>> They are fast and reliable. I personly just never used them for testing. >>> Am 21.08.2014 16:58 schrieb Maatary Okouya <[email protected] >>> <javascript:>>: >>> >>> I use package by feature in my test source. I took it from BDD >>> practices. I like it because it give you straight away the specification of >>> your software. Specification that reflect what you software does and how >>> does it do it. How to use your software. From my feature specification all >>> the way down to my unit. I actually package by capabilities that the >>> features realize. I adhere to the idea that, test are actually >>> specification. So when i look at my code, i don't care about the >>> implementation detail. I care about its capabilities, what it does. Hence i >>> look are the feature that realize those capabilities; That is where i >>> connect to the feature spec all the way down to the unit spec. but that is >>> out of scope >>> >>> In any case, why are you against using the module override >>> functionality ? What is wrong with it? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected] >>> <javascript:>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:42:04 PM UTC+2, scl wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you pass dependencies in you constructor which are not required >>>>> for the test then your class has most likely too many responsibilities. >>>>> If all your dependencies are required for the test you have to adapt >>>>> the test any ways and should not worry about the compiler errors but >>>>> embrace them since they help you find all the test cases which need >>>>> update. >>>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Wrt the visibility of the constructors, because it's a generally >>>> accepted practice to put tests in the same package as the class under >>>> test, >>>> using a package-private constructor just works (you could annotate it with >>>> some @VisibleForTesting annotation if you still find that "too visible" >>>> and >>>> fear that some developer would use the constructor directly; with such >>>> annotation, or similar comment in the javadoc, you can later blame them >>>> for >>>> not following the rule ;-) ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>>> Google Groups "google-guice" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/12JI7LFFFJs/unsubscribe. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>> [email protected] <javascript:>. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>> <javascript:>. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/762ada39-ba7f-4eb7-8b36-6fac5104b46a%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/762ada39-ba7f-4eb7-8b36-6fac5104b46a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "google-guice" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> <javascript:>. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAEqpkuv3pst2Hq4HAFL-Y0sMpneMMmeK12vJrd71cYin717WcA%40mail.gmail.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAEqpkuv3pst2Hq4HAFL-Y0sMpneMMmeK12vJrd71cYin717WcA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. >>> >>> >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "google-guice" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/12JI7LFFFJs/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> <javascript:>. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/0M0LtB-1WVC7G0P5p-00ucDC%40mail.gmx.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/0M0LtB-1WVC7G0P5p-00ucDC%40mail.gmx.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. >>> >>> >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "google-guice" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAEqpkuvGh7oj-87kWeS4g%2BK15_kFUfaAJ3aPh7yxsAJPKjXfJg%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAEqpkuvGh7oj-87kWeS4g%2BK15_kFUfaAJ3aPh7yxsAJPKjXfJg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "google-guice" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-guice/12JI7LFFFJs/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/53F65361.7080607%40gmx.ch >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/53F65361.7080607%40gmx.ch?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/4be777f6-cfdb-40e2-b138-620434ca07da%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
