Yes.  I think I'm going to back out the ImplementedBy support in a few 
weeks.  Long story but it requires some refactoring.

And I couldn't wrap my head around Jukito but maybe I need to spend some 
time on it.

I guess it just auto-creates mocks for me.  

Kevin

On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 11:22:50 PM UTC-7, scl wrote:
>
> Yes, you don't want to have dependencies on your test code.
>
> If all you need is injection of mocks then you may want to look at jukito 
> as it can inject mocks for any dependency for which you havn't bound an 
> implementation.
> Am 29.10.2014 02:52 schrieb Sam Berlin <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
> @ImplementedBy is generally a bad idea because it forces your API to have 
> a dependency on your implementation.  @MockedBy would be even worse, 
> because it would force your API to have a dependency on your tests.
>
> If you're looking to make testing mocked bindings easier, see 
> https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/BoundFields, new in Guice 4.0.
>
> sam
>
> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 7:01:31 PM Kevin Burton <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> @ImplementedBy is handy because I can have the reference implementation 
>> defined in the interface.
>>
>> But for tests, I have to manually create bindings.  
>>
>> I wonder if something similar is needed for mocks.  Maybe a @MockedBy  ?
>>
>> Or maybe it's a bad idea :-P
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/cb2a65d0-24cb-4c7f-93ea-3655d5dafdc1%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/cb2a65d0-24cb-4c7f-93ea-3655d5dafdc1%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "google-guice" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAJEBNUc88JxpeTyoj64NcK2JBhn%3DqwHdoSk8LtFfXTuV1k3R2w%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAJEBNUc88JxpeTyoj64NcK2JBhn%3DqwHdoSk8LtFfXTuV1k3R2w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/4d943869-9ed6-409c-870f-cdf0389f4f54%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to