I just ran into this today and think it might be a bug? I have a Provider<Foo> which kind of implies that it would be explicitly setup in a binding.
But it looks like the default constructor was being called. This was giving me an non-started ActiveMQ broker which wasn't working. Doesn't Provider sort of imply that it's going to be explicitly provided? Doing this implicitly seems like it's just prone to bugs. I prefer Guice to fail fast ...is there a way do disable some of this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/5a00ad7b-a9d0-4f70-bf5d-5b7ff5d92b73%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
