You should benchmark this yourself to find out. Side note, why not Guice 4.0?
On Monday, 10 August 2015 14:27:23 UTC-4, Artem Nakonechny wrote: > > I use Guice 3.0. > > On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 9:24:45 PM UTC+3, Artem Nakonechny wrote: >> >> Hello. >> It there any significant performance overhead if I use Matchers.any() vs >> Matchers.subclassesOf() in binder.bindInterceptor() ? >> I have a small percentage of classes I'd like to apply my interceptor to. >> I do not very much like introducing a marker interface to use >> subclassesOf(). So if the overhead is negligible - I'd opt for any(). >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/dd8266f2-1d7f-483f-abb8-745eb81a1079%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
