Ahh.. i was travelling and did not check the issues list. Thanks a lot for the reports, i fix them most likely this week, when the jet lag is gone....

Frank Mantek

On 8/13/06, RichB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Frank Mantek wrote:
> Rich, what do you mean with "those setters are buggy" ? In the sense that
> setting it as a client has no effect? or is there a real bug i do not know
> about? If so, i encourage you to use the issue database at
> code.google.com/p/google-gdata
>
I pointed to issue #8:
http://code.google.com/p/google-gdata/issues/detail?id=8

although in this case probably issue #9 is more relevant
http://code.google.com/p/google-gdata/issues/detail?id=9

> If you really do not mind just using the links collection, I actually might
> tend to remove the setters. It is less confusing...
>

My code isn't that important. I would much prefer gdata to have a clean
homogenous API and if removing the setters helps with that, I'm all for
it. (Make the 80% easy and the other 20% possible).


Richard






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Data API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-help-dataapi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-help-dataapi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to