Study on AI non-use is a nightmare
I just read through a new, detailed, seemingly statistical rigorous
academic study researching why people don't use AI. Its conclusions on
this question are not unreasonable, and while I don't agree with all
of them, there are salient points.
I am not going to give this study any direct oxygen by linking to it
or naming it specifically. Because in my personal view, its entire
purpose is nightmarish.
The ultimate focus is obviously on one key aspect, what do the Big
Tech Billionaires need to do to suck EVERYONE into using these
horrible systems. The entire study -- again, in my opinion -- is an
effort to create a roadmap for Big Tech to "adjust" what they're doing
to undermine the concerns non-users of the tech have, and seduce them
into becoming addicted users instead.
There was no sense that not using generative AI is a valid choice,
rather it's seen as an aberration that needs to be eliminated.
I found the entire study to be both interesting and disgusting.
L
- - -
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
[email protected] (https://www.vortex.com/lauren)
Lauren's Blog: https://lauren.vortex.com
Mastodon: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren
Signal: By request on need to know basis
Founder: Network Neutrality Squad: https://www.nnsquad.org
PRIVACY Forum: https://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility
_______________________________________________
google-issues mailing list
https://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/google-issues
