There's a huge difference between what Google employees (x thousand people) run and what Google's customers (y million people) run.
Commercially, you support your customers. If it'll cost you the same to produce and support a version for linux as it would for Windows, but there's orders of magnitude more revenue in one than the other then which do you think they would do? On Jun 2, 5:30 am, R <[email protected]> wrote: > Reading this article in Financial Times : > > http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d2f3f04e-6ccf-11df-91c8-00144feab49a.html > > Why Google don't port Picasa to Linux? > > Linux community and also their employees would be grateful for it. Unfortunately "grateful" doesn't pay the shareholders That said, there's probably more chance that someone will now make the current one run on linux in their 10% time . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.
