Okay, great, thanks for letting me know.

- pamel

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:37 AM, RBraxton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi pamela,
>
> I upgraded instead.  Upgrading to 3 is better anyways, due to future
> compatibility guarantee.  So I don't see a benefit in generating
> another library for FxB2.
>
> FYI: The error seemed to be related to including skin information in
> the swc.  (according to articles found on the internet)  I don't
> recall the specific wording but it amounted to stating the file format
> was not valid/not as expected.
>
> I would still recommend not spending time trying to support the prior
> version since it would not be future proof anyways.
>
> On Jan 14, 12:44 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Hi RBraxton-
>>
>> It's possible that it's not compatible. I have Flex Builder 3, and
>> that's what we officially support for this API. Is there a particular
>> error when using it?
>>
>> - pamela
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:37 AM, RBraxton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > This does not appear to be compatible with Flex Builder 2.  Is this
>> > correct?
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API For Flash" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api-for-flash?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to