Thanks for the links!
On May 10, 5:19 am, pamela fox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Arothian-
>
> According to our HTTP services documentation, they're ordered in terms
> of best to least
> match:http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/geocoding/#ReverseGeoc...
>
> The format is shown in a bit more detail here - it follows a rather
> hard-to-parse schema called
> xAL.http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/geocoding/#JSON
>
> You can read about the ExtendedData information
> here:http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API/browse_frm/thread/53c4...
>
> It's not a great format, I know.. Star this
> request:http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=606
>
> - pamela
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Arothian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know how the placemarks in a GeocodingResponse are
> > ordered? I was under the assumption that the first result would have
> > the highest accuracy, but that doesn't seem to be the case. In
> > particular, when doing reverse geocoding the number of potential
> > placemarks is large and I wanted to avoid having to examine each one.
>
> > Additionally, is there any more documentation about Placemark? The
> > 'addressDetails' property contains no documentation about it's
> > contents. Additionally some placemarks appear to have an
> > 'ExtendedData' property as well.
>
> > Try geocoding 42.790282,-85.930687 on
> >http://gmaps-samples-flash.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/GeocodingDe....
> > You'll see what I mean about the placemark ordering and undocumented
> > information.
>
> > Thanks
>
> > -Arothian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API For Flash" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api-for-flash?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
