I understand you are angry about them depreciating the flash api, but 2 
years is a long time in technology. I am sure you can find some angry 
cobalt developers. Also I don't know where this illusion about microsoft 
comes from, they have dumped tons of projects, want to talk about a sinking 
ship, their online division is currently bleeding a billion dollars a 
quarter. In reference to their apis, the google Javascript API has always 
been under development and predates the flash API significantly.

Yes Pamela Fox was exceptional, and she was very unique, but when I talked 
with her at Google IO even she said, no one uses the flash API when I asked 
why the flash API wasn't getting styled maps at the same time. This is 
technology dude, if you think microsoft is any different you're 
really delusional. You might not be aware of this but Google's flash API 
was actually acquired from the same guys which gave bing it's first flash 
support (umapper).

Two years is more then enough time for a depreciation period, and who knows 
there might be a good reason for them to pull it out of depreciation. 
Whenever you use third party anything there is always the chance that this 
could happen. I will admit, that I do think the depreciation was brought on 
about 1-2 years too early, ces't la vie. All my future projects are using 
the Google Javascript API, I am not really concerned about depreciation of 
that API, and so far it looks like their quotas will actually be cheaper 
then bing's.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API For Flash" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-api-for-flash/-/d9HKpn0tA14J.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-api-for-flash@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-maps-api-for-flash+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api-for-flash?hl=en.

Reply via email to