I have similar sentiments, but I think that as we modularize more
classes, the process gets better and we make the modularization more
seamless for developers. Hopefully. :)


On Sep 1, 12:41 pm, Garthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always like hearing and dread hearing about modulariization changes.
>
> I like them because the ideal of a core google maps that only has the
> tiling system (logo and attributions) should be a very small
> beast..could be reached by this route in a way that is painless
> to endusers...
> in the mean time they result in timing issues where classes you expect
> to be available arent till later.
>
> pamela (Google Employee) wrote:
> > Hey folks,
>
> > Last night we pushed 2.126 as 2.x and 2.125 as 2. We modularized more
> > controls, as well as the KeyboardHandler class. The changelog is here:
>
> >http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/wiki/JavascriptMapsAPIChang...
>
> > Note that there was a slight change in our numbering scheme, and 2.126
> > is actually 2.126d. Since we really don't want folks to have to look
> > up the exact letter of a release when they hard code to it, we'll be
> > putting in a change so that 2.126 aliases to the released letter
> > version.
>
> > As usual, please post regression bugs in the Issue Tracker after
> > verifying here that they're bugs in our code.
>
> > Thanks!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to