I just looked at your json.. .. you definitely dont want the parseFloats in there...
On Sep 23, 12:30 pm, Garthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I havent ever seen IE behave better with more javascript processing > that qualifies as an oxymoron.. Do you have the data in an XML > format? > just curious how it might process via my GeoXml class (it converts > into > a json format) > > On Sep 23, 12:02 pm, Black Fog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't know how many vertices you have in your polygons, > > > seems too much. > > > > but it might > > > be appropriate to simplify them, make them graphical overlays, or a > > > separate set of tiles. > > > never worked with these graphical overlays before, but could be worth > > to try it. > > > reducing the amount of vertices made at least ff laugh, but the result > > (using gm polygons) isn't satisfying. > > original json source can be found > > here:http://www.lars-mielke.de/showcases/google/json.json > > maybe a look before (killing the browser process) would be helpful. > > > thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
