For your 60-80 polylines (500 vertices) it sounds like encoding would improve performance for you.
Try the interactive polyline encoder here: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/polylineutility.html and test it out. (you can paste your own lat/lng's into the 'point list') Mapperz http://mapperz.blogspot.com/ On Nov 1, 12:32 pm, John Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it nobler to reduced download time for the data and the increased > client side effort to decode the strings or vice versa? > > Does anyone have any strong views/evidence about whether it's better > to encode polylines or not? > > I'm going to be displaying around 60-80 polylines, roughly 500 points > each. > > Has anyone run any tests on this? > > Regards and thanks for you view > > John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
