On Nov 27, 5:15 pm, Bebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to use Google Maps on a free web application that also > offers a "Pro" version. "Pro" paid user has the simple advantage to be > able to see multiple maps on the same screen whereas the regular user > can see just one map at the same time. > The content, format, size ecc.. of the maps will be exactly the same.
It looks like this is OK as far as 9.1 goes, because you're not *requiring* users to pay a fee to get the maps, but I think it falls foul of 10.4: "You must not charge users or any other third party any fee for the use of the Maps API Implementation, the Service, or the Content". If the simple advantage of the Pro version is the maps implementation having more than one map, and there is no other reason to pay, then you are charging for a particular implementation of the API. If there were some other reason to pay then you *might* be able to argue that you're not charging for the use of the Maps API implementation; but even that is doubtful -- if you're not charging for that, you could offer it to the free users. Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
