http://econym.googlepages.com/example_egeotestmon.htm
(using egeoxml.js) http://econym.googlepages.com/egeoxml.htm Mapperz http://mapperz.blogspot.com/ On Dec 5, 7:39 am, Martijn van der Plaat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I changed to false so my script is synchroon : request.open("GET", > "states2.xml", false); > The next problem is that In firefox the polygons won't show up. see my > page:http://profec.nl/profec/gmaps/index1.php > In IE everything still works fine! How strange is that! > > Can anybody help? > > Greets Martijn. > > On 4 dec, 21:18, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 10:30 am, Martijn van der Plaat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Hi experts, > > > > I try to directly check in a map of a certain point is in a polygon. > > > see:http://profec.nl/profec/gmaps/index1.php > > > > first lookup my code. > > > > The problem is that, as you can see in the first popup, javascript > > > thinks polys.length() is 0, but in reality polys.length() is 2, as you > > > can see in the second popup. What i think is that the code goes faster > > > then xml can load. Strange enough the script works in IE. > > > Maybe the problem is solved when i pre-load the polygons before i do a > > > poly.length() function? Please look in my code to better understand my > > > problem. > > > My intention is an applicatie with: > > > > 1. longitude+latitude as input from a GPS device > > > 2. the input is checked against several polygons on a map > > > 3. the output is a unique id that belongs to the found polygon. > > > 4. I use the id in my further program because the id is identical to > > > an id in a database > > > > so i only use the whole map as a check function to know in which > > > polygon my GPS exists. > > > > Maybe another solution is not using the google map at all, and just > > > lookup if my current gps coordinate is in a specific list of polygons, > > > using point-in-polygon algoritmehttp://alienryderflex.com/polygon/ > > > But i thought because the google map can tell me directly in which > > > polygon the point is i dont have to walk through the whole list of > > > existing polygons, and thereby the google map solution is faster. But > > > at the moment i realy doubt this! > > > Part 2 Asynchronous I/Ohttp://econym.org.uk/gmap/async.htm > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
