2008/12/8 mapperzUK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > lat&lng back-to-front too > 1.4312610, 51.3558470
Actully I dont beleive so, its always been like that. The JSON format is based on KML - which has it that way round. http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/kmlreference.html#coordinates > > should be > 51.3558470,1.4312610 > > Flat structure would be good. > > Bounding Box would be good. > > Mapperz > http://mapperz.blogspot.com/ > > On Dec 8, 2:58 pm, marcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No bounding box to be seen, and no flat structure either. :-( >> >> Furthermore, the query is "St. Lawrence Ave.", but the address >> returned is "Luton Ave." >> Did that street change name recently? (Pamela?) >> >> -- >> Marcelo -http://maps.forum.nu >> -- >> >> On Dec 8, 9:36 am, "Neil.Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I don't see it either. A download box pops up... Using only parts of the >> > url doesn't help either.. >> >> > pamela (Google Employee) schrieb: >> >> > > It's out there now. Enjoy! >> > >http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?output=jsonl&oe=utf-8&q=St%20Lawrence... >> > > <http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?output=jsonl&oe=utf-8&q=St%20Lawrence...> >> >> > > - pamela >> >> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Erik Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> > > Hi Pamela, >> >> > > Would just like to chime in that this would be a very useful feature. >> > > I hope it emerges one day! >> >> > > Erik >> >> > > On Nov 3, 3:32 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> > > wrote: >> > > > Hi Kevin- >> > > > We expect the change to go out in the next few weeks, but we, of >> > > course, >> > > > cannot make guarantees. >> > > > - pamela >> >> > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Kevin Menard >> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>wrote: >> >> > > > > Hi Pamela, >> >> > > > > Correct. Apologies for the loose terminology. >> >> > > > > Do you have a status update on this by chance? We've been >> > > holding off >> > > > > on rolling our own bounding box calculation, figuring Google >> > > could do >> > > > > it better than we could. But, if it's going to be a while >> > > longer, >> > > > > we'll probably have to pull the trigger. >> >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Kevin >> >> > > > > On Sep 30, 1:18 pm, "pamela (Google Employee)" >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > Kevin- >> > > > > > This would be available in the HTTP Geocoder output and >> > > JS/Flash >> > > > > > Geocoder functions. (I assume by static you mean HTTP). >> >> > > > > > Marcelo- >> > > > > > Interesting idea. >> >> > > > > > By the way, we're waiting another few weeks before releasing >> > > this change. >> >> > > > > > - pamela >> >> > > > -- Barry - www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
