bratliff wrote: > On Dec 19, 5:50 am, Mike Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wasn't it Lance Dyas who wrote: >> >> >>> I tend to chime in by saying test for yourself... check out this... >>> http://celtickane.com/webdesign/jsspeedarchive.phpNote you need to be >>> a brave soul to actually load IE8 and I only "test" my own sites with >>> Safari. >>> >>> They are probably not testing for activities which actually exploit >>> chromes multi tasking capabilities. >>> >> Weird. Using his test page with my hardware, Chrome is 2.33x faster than >> Safari, whereas he logs it as 1.62x slower. >> >> If you're feeling really brave you could try the tests with TraceMonkey. >> Word is that it could well be significantly faster than Chrome. >> >> Just for fun, on my machine Flock 1.2.5 comes out as 6.96x slower than >> Chrome 1.0.154. His benchmark code crashes in my MSIE6 and in Avant. >> >> --http://econym.org.uk/gmap >> The Blackpool Community Church Javascript Team >> > > It might be interesting to test the durability of each browser under > stress - how many tiles can be replaced how quickly without crashing. > right javascript isnt the only component we deal with ... though I am not specifically aware of great disparagements in capabilities in image handling. (aside from the svg/vml./canvas stuff)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
