On Jan 6, 8:45 pm, "warden [Andrew Leach - Maps API Guru]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Isn't it? I'm not sure who your "No" was directed to.

It was directed at Markw65, who said that "The spherical "triangle" is
just a line".
By definition, this is not a spherical triangle.

> There *are* three great circles there, I think: part of the Prime
> Meridian (0,0 to 87,0), part of the Equator (0,0 to 0,180), and part
> of an oblique great circle connecting 87,0 to 0,180.

Not really.
0,0 is on the Prime Meridian.
87,0 is also on the Prime Meridian.
0,180 is on the Anti-Meridian.

Prime Meridian + Anti-Meridian together are one Great Circle.


 Usinghttp://maps.forum.nu/gm_flight_path.htmland points 85,0 to 0,180
> which lie on the map, the line goes around the Pole, on the opposite
> side of the earth from the US [ie across Asia]. It doesn't follow the
> Meridian. That does describe a spherical triangle.

If it goes accross the pole, (and it does), it follows the meridians
exactly, only that it might look funny due to the Mercator projection.

>
> Even if the northernmost point of the three was actually at the Pole,
> there would still be two great circles involved, the Meridian and the
> Equator, and a bilinear segment of a quarter of the Earth would
> result.

There are, in fact two great circles involved, but still all three
points lie on the same great circle, (Prime Meridian + Anti-Meridian).
It's like a slice of an orange, not a triangle.
In order to have a spherical triangle you need "three great circular
arcs", as per the definition, or three great circles, not one, not
two. :-)

--
Marcelo - http://maps.forum.nu
--

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to