On Jan 21, 6:06 pm, seamusmorton <[email protected]> wrote: > My code is making exactly the same request that the javascript > is making, it's just using php to make the request from my server > rather than having javascript do it from the client.
So it *is* making an HTTP request, without using the API. Doesn't that violate 10.1? > I was wondering about the premier API too. Basically, if I was to pay > for the usage of it could an exception be made? I don't think the Premier licence allows you to use a service Google don't provide. You could always ask; but it certainly isn't cheap. > I've put an awful lot of work into this and I'd hate to drop the whole > thing because Google requires me to make the request using javascript > and not php Sorry. You asked the question; it's against the TOS. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, and I'm sure you realise now that it would have been better to verify your method before investing in it heavily. Of course, what you do now is up to you; but if Google catch you doing things you shouldn't they're not going to be pleased. I *believe* there is the possibility of interaction between Javascript and Java, but (a) I'm not a Java programmer; (b) I wouldn't want to be seduced by the marketingspeak which thought "Ecmascript" sounded like a skin condition. Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
