http://pskreporter.info/wxnearbylatest.html shows that the problem is still there in 2.140g. From doing some more searching, it sounds very like issue 833: http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=833
However, 833 is marked as resolved in 2.140g, and this bug is still present. However, in my case, I am invoking panTo rather than setCenter during a continuousZoom. Philip On Jan 30, 12:20 am, Philip <[email protected]> wrote: > warden [Andrew Leach - Maps API Guru] wrote: > > > > > On Jan 20, 1:40 pm, Philip <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a much simpler case that exhibits a similar problem between > > > 2.138 and 2.139. > > > >http://pskreporter.info/cgi-bin/wxnearby138.pl > > >http://pskreporter.info/cgi-bin/wxnearby139.pl > > > > You will observe that (in particular) the zoom controls and the map > > > type controls do not load in the 139 version. This is due to an error > > > (in Firefox 3 at least). This is 100% reproducible, and does not > > > depend on any external interaction. > > > I don't have Firefox 3, but both pages show the zoom control and map- > > type control in Firefox 2. You may have found a problem between the > > Maps API v2.139 and a plug-in, perhaps. Firebug works in Firefox 3, so > > presumably that will give a hint about what's going wrong in your > > case. > > The problem exhibits itself in IE. > > If you look at > > http://pskreporter.info/wxnearby139.html > > this is much simpler test case. I would hazard a guess that it is to > do with the fact I do the following (in this order): > > Create the GMap2 object > setCenter -- tight zoom to boston > EnableContinuousZoom > SetZoom -- wide zoom > PanTo -- center of the US > > It doesn't fail every time in firefox 3.0, but pressing shift-reload a > few times will show the problem (the map does not end up with the map > type controls on it) > > In IE 6, you *sometimes* get "undefined" is null or not an object. > > If I remove the continuouszoom, then it doesn't seem to fail. If I > remove the setzoom, then it doesn't seem to fail. > > This example is entirely standalone and (after editing in the > appropriate key) will run anywhere. > > Maybe the above sequence of API calls is not allowed -- but they seem > reasonable to me, and they worked just fine until version 2.139.... > > Philip --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
