Yes, I've been doing that. Satellite goes up to 23 or so before the resolution gets too bad to be of further use. Your parser is definitely way better than the GGeoXml. But the best so far is not "parsing" at all. Just reading as polygons from an XML. And, I think I can add some arrays or an array for lines and areas using simple code, treating the data the same way I treat my existing XML. I should, in theory, be able to append new text right in the romanholiday.xml file, right?
Of course it's going to take me, the amateur, forever to iron it all out, but I think it'll be worth the time. After all, I have only a few overlays to create, and they aren't going to change. It's all simple, static stuff. A brute force method will suffice! You're very kind to offer the use of your various codings. On Mar 5, 9:22 pm, Lance Dyas <[email protected]> wrote: > If you switch your map type to Satellite... you will be able to go in an > additional zoom level on that page and see that > the shapes are better than they seem ;-) > > That page is one usage of the parser source is > availablehttp://code.google.com/p/geoxml/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
