So rather than generate a KML and send it to ggeoXML just parse the data directly using (javascript?) and display it as an overlay from there - without relying on the processing of google servers at all?
Do I understand your suggestion correctly? On Apr 29, 10:57 am, Andrew Leach <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 29, 6:39 pm, Dommer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > My question is: why, how, and what can I do to abrogate this > > simplification (if anything). > > GGeoXml does that. It's a feature, presumably to simplify the > processing on their server and the generation of image tiles if that's > necessary. > > No idea how, it's done server-side. > > You could parse the KML yourself instead of passing it off to Google > to do. > > Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
