On Jun 4, 2:36 am, andrewljohnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> This kind of caught me by surprise, and I wonder if this browser
> variation shouldn't be addressed within the GMap code itself.
It is undocumented, so it's only really possible to guess.
I reckon that as sprites are effectively a small piece of a larger
image, both left and top are actually required, and if a browser
assumes missing data to be zero, *that* may be a problem.
It's already known that parseFloat("") yields NaN in both browsers,
but that Firefox will happily place a marker using that data. So it
definitely handles NaN differently.
Andrew
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
