On Jul 9, 11:55 pm, bratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 9, 8:35 pm, msasha <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think you've misunderstood what my problem was. > > > I did, however, try implementing it simply by changing the width/ > > height of the tiles themselves, and surprisingly, in Mozilla, it seems > > to actually work smoother than using -moz-transform on the containing > > element. > > Right. Which is why Google uses it, simple pixel arithmetic, no > browser dependent transformations. > > I believe "-moz-transform" is new for FF 3.5. Continuous zooming is > several years old. > > If I have misunderstood what you were asking, perhaps you can clarify.
When continuous zoom was first released, I believe it only worked on IE, which has the IE-only "zoom" CSS attribute. I (erroneously, it seems) assumed that the reason for this was that simply scaling the images was too slow. Upon actual testing, however, it seems to be fast enough. Alexander (aka Sasha) Maryanovsky. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
