On Jul 24, 3:52 pm, Risingfish <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep. That's it exactly. We've done a little experimentation and if you > remove the transparent PNG's used for the background, it works > normally (albeit looks bad). That's why we're looking at using a 3rd > party infoWindow that does not use the transparent PNGs for shadow. Is > this a bug worth reporting to Google?
The problem is that tinybox.js varies the opacity of images. IE's DXImageTransform cannot cope with varying the opacity of transparent images, so the transparent parts become non-transparent. That's not really Google's fault. I think the fix would be to make sure opacity is not set at all (=default of 100%) when an image should be 100% visible so that the transparent parts stay transparent. The side- effect then would be that transparent parts become non-transparent as the image fades in and out. Or: use graphics which remove or minimise the transparent areas so that they're not so obvious in IE. Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
