Yes, I was talking about the GGeoXml. Everything I want to do is within the scope of GGeoXml so I'm fine with it's limitations in this application. That's what I'm using on the current version of the map.
If I can get the markers to disappear from the parse of the xml, which now only contains the points to be used for sidebar entries, I'll be done with it. I tried adding a reference to a custom icon to each marker in the xml (a one pixel image) and then using the parseFloat and getAttribute functions to get that information for the markers. I can't get the createMarker function to use that reference as the icon instead of using the default icon. On Jul 30, 10:48 am, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm surprised that the myclick() function location is a problem. It > > works in the example. > > Look at the example again ; the myclick() function is not enclosed in > any other functions. > > > Can I load the polys out of a > > kml file (using the standard method for kml data) and then load > > points, without the icons, using this method for the sidebar? > > KML is just one kind of XML, you can do what you like with it in your > own parser. > > Don't know what you mean by 'standard method', GGeoXml I guess. > This is where we came in ; GGeoXml has limitations, both about how > much data it can handle and how much you can customise what it does. > There are alternatives or you can cook your own. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
