On Sep 17, 6:16 pm, koenigmedia <[email protected]> wrote: > ok im done here
You shouldn't be. You should be including the location in your database so that a single query gets the address AND the coordinates and you don't have to geocode a known address every time the page is viewed. This * improves the user experience (geocoding is comparatively slow), * is constantly accurate (geocoder data changes, sometimes for the worse) and * doesn't waste Google's resources (which are then available for real geocoding applications). You could write a server-side script which read through the database, fired off a geocode request for each address and updated the record with the result, and waited a couple of seconds before doing the next one to keep within the 15000/day limit. That's a one-time operation. Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
