Marcelo is a big contributor to this list, and treating him poorly will not endear you to anyone else around here. Which would you (or more importantly your employer!) prefer:
1) you realize now that you **may** be violating the TOS and have a fair chance to do something about it, either by implementing a different solution, making your implementation freely available, or acquiring a premier license; or 2) you ignore the problem, Google realizes what you are doing, and suddenly shuts down your service. You then find yourself in the position of having a non-functioning implementation, and have to scramble to accomplish (1) anyhow. The reason people around here appear somewhat anal about making sure the TOS are not being violated is because they are already restrictive enough. Are claims of potential violations always correct? No. However, if we help people violate said terms, Google will be forced to put even more strict processes in place, and none of us want that. The contributors to this list almost *always* strive to make sure the TOS are being respected before solving any other problems. That is simply something you'll have to accept if you want the free and highly knowledgeable help you'll find here. -G On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Andy Idema wrote: > Marcelo, please stop responding. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
