I've actually tried out some road coordinates and the correct result was always the 1st one in the set. So I guess I can use it :)
Thanks for your help and infinite patience Andrew Leach :) Thanks to the others aswell! On Feb 15, 4:33 pm, Andrew Leach <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 15, 3:27 pm, JuKKi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > well from what i can see all the roads are being marked correctly, so > > this problem should be resolved. So theoretically reverse geocoding > > should also work? i.e. supplying the lat and long values and returning > > the street? > > The standard answer to "does it work?" is "Why not try it?" > > Geocoding accepts either an address or a set of coordinates: the > syntax is the same, so you can just enter on of the results > athttp://econym.org.uk/gmap/example_geo.htmand see what happens. Try > 35.8839452, 14.4964614. It looks like reverse geocoding isn't > brilliant, although the top result is actually correct. This may be > why it's not listed as supported, though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
