OK. Thanks. On 19 fév, 20:35, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 19, 11:29 am, JCD <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello. > > I've already tested my maps with the api v2 and it works well enough, > > so I'm going to use Javascript ;) > > I wanted to know if the api v3 is not worse, without the encoding of > > polylines and markermanagers. > > v3 is still in labs. Last I looked at it, it had less functionality > than v2, and is certainly less mature (documented features can change > intentionally). > > You could ask the same question in the v3 group. You might get a > better answer from people that are using > it...http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/ > > -- Larry > > > > > > > On 19 fév, 17:38, "maps.huge.info [Maps API Guru]" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > From your description, using any form of traditional markers and > > > polylines is going to cause sluggish behavior on either version of the > > > API. You might consider using something other than JavaScript objects. > > > They eat resources like crazy. > > > > You'll have to really manage your data carefully to get anything > > > resembling smooth dragging. > > > > -John Coryat > > > >http://maps.huge.info > > > >http://www.usnaviguide.com > > > >http://www.zipmaps.net-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Masquer le texte des messages précédents - > > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
