IMHO of course, but seem that http://www.mapstraction.com/ is a easier way to get the same (or very similar) result.
Its a cool demo, but the issues doesnt seem to make it worth it. On 28 October 2010 15:13, chrismarx <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Everyone loves the birdseye imagery in Bing maps, but wants to keep > using their code base using the Google Maps api. The TOU's for each > service specify that the only legal way to use the imagery is through > their respective api's. So here's a demo that does that: > > http://warbler2.ornith.cornell.edu/test/google/maps/google-and-bing-map.html > > A normal google map is loaded on top, but a custom gmaptype with > transparent tiles is added, and when you switch to that layer, it > reveals the bing map in an iframe beneath. This actually works pretty > well; the google marker and controls are still visible, you can > interact with the marker, but panning is problematic. The two maps > projections/zooms/? are a bit off, and if you drag the map around, > you'll see that the marker doesn't stay put. > > I thought before attacking this any further I'd put this up here, and > see if perhaps someone could put their finger on a solution to this > problem- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps API V2" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API V2" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
