140 MB is a brutal amount of data to send to any browser, unless you're streaming a movie, which happens gradually.
Why would you need such a large file? Did you consider alternatives? There are probably better ways to accomplish whatever it is you're trying to do. -- Marcelo - http://maps.forum.nu -- On Jan 23, 5:38 am, NKhandelwal <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried plotting a very large KML (approx. 140 MB) on google maps. As > feared no output was observed. On some search over the internet, I > eventually stumbled upon a link explaining the constraints wrt to > plotting KML's on google maps. Here's the link: > > http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/mapsSupport.html > > I contacted the Google map team for help and was suggested to break > the KML into several smaller pieces, each abiding to the constraints. > I did so and was able to plot these one at a time. On arranging the > KML's sequentially and plotting the KML's one by one in a single > function, the plots were made for some number of KML's but when I > tried to plot all smaller KML's from the parent KML, the browser > showed some plots while not the others. Seems like there is some > particular buffer size which the browser can manage. Can anyone guide > me on this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API V2" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
