On Jun 28, 1:45 pm, mark mcclure <[email protected]> wrote: > It should be no surprise that the first loads faster, since it much > smaller. the first loads the encoded coastline in a separate 200KB javascript, and the second has the data within the 2 megabyte html file. If gzip compression was enabled on the web server, then the download for the second would be near to 300KB instead of 2 megabytes, and the two pages would load in similar times.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
