I am not a lawyer. I do not know of any legal restrictions to using /gx or /sf - they merely translate publicly available documents to a custom format. However sf and gx are private interfaces and subject to change or removal without notice.
On 17 Jul 2010 02:04, "bratliff" <bratl...@umich.edu> wrote: > A third party developer has very little incentive to do it. I am > looking for something clean & simple, essentially, a clone of your > "gx" / "sf" service. Google has the skills to do it without excessive > overhead & superfluous features. Would it be a waste of time to file > a feature request in the issue tracker for legal access to your "gx" / > "sf" service ? Is it illegal to directly use your "gx" / "sf" > service ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-maps-js-api-v3%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> . > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
