Hi William, If in future we choose to implement any other form of indexing of content that is displayed on an API map but that is not already hosted by Google, we will announce that in the Group and on the blog, and provide an opt out. However we have no plans to do that at this time.
Many thanks, Thor. On Aug 2, 11:36 am, William <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thor, in another thread you mentioned that Google was currently > drafting an update to the ToS. Will there be an amendment to the > Content License in 11.1? > > The way I see it, the indexing of map content in Markers and > InfoWindows was just one mechanism permitted under 11.1, and in future > Google might develop better methods of indexing map content. So to > quote the ToS "if you are unable or unwilling to provide such a > license to Your Content", will Google still be offering the > "indexing=false" parameter to permit the user to opt out of any future > indexing mechanism, regardless of API version or technique of logging > data from the map to Google? > > Obviously if the map data is originating from the Maps Data API, then > ToS Paragraph 11 doesn't offer any opt-out clause, because the data is > already hosted on Google's servers and can be directly indexed. And > the same would apply to data in KML and Fusion Tables where the map > content can be directly indexed. > > Maps ToS:http://code.google.com/apis/maps/terms.html > Maps Data > ToS:http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/mapsdata/terms.html > > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
