Sorry, I should have said that I was using V3 (or hoping to be using) V3. I had found a specific reference while tooling through the V3 pages that I now wonder if they are intended for V2. Here is the link:
There is purported to be support for Regions (at least that is the way I'm reading it) for V3 according to the document in the link you provided below: (http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/ mapsSupport.html): I've cut and pasted: * Regions inside network links (for efficient loading of large KML datasets) New! I've taken your suggestion and have loaded the stuff on a link you can view: http://dev.sci-nevada.com/GMapsRegions/KMLRomania.aspx This file was cut and pasted from an example provided at the link (which I see now is obviously a V2 link): http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/kml_21tutorial.html#workingregions I saved the first file listed as "Part 1: Parent file" in at: http://dev.sci-nevada.com/GMapsRegions/regionparent.kml I save the second file listed as "Part 2: Region-based NetworkLink file" at: http://dev.sci-nevada.com/GMapsRegions/romaniaregion.kml Then I reference the two in a V3 file you can access: http://dev.sci-nevada.com/GMapsRegions/KMLRomania.aspx When you go there you'll note that KML from both files appears to be displayed. The larger rectangle comes from the regionparent.kml file and the smaller embedded rectangle comes from the romaniaRegion.kml file. If I was only seeing the effects of the regionparent.kml I wouldn't expect to see the smaller embedded rectangle. If the regionizing/loading/fading was working I would expect to see the larger rectangle disappear at some level of zoom. Doesn't seem to ... I assume I'm missing something trivial and obvious, but I'm a newbie and don't get it ... Thanks for any help you can provide ... On Sep 28, 2:38 am, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this example actually work? > > What KML features actually work, and how they are implemented, depends > on what you use to view the KML. Can we can guess you are using > KmlLayer with the V3 API? > This outlines KML support in maps.google.com > http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/mapsSupport.html > but I strongly suspect it does not describe what is supported in > KmlLayer so well. > > > I'd love to send a screen trap of > > what I'm seeing, but don't see how to attach graphics to a discussion > > Doesn't matter; a link to a live webpage showing your map with the > problem would allow people to see the problem, the code, and the KML -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
