On Oct 31, 8:35 am, Pil <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 31, 1:42 pm, "[email protected]" > > > I haven't seen an implementation for v3. > > When I look at Mikes example at > > http://econym.org.uk/gmap/arrows.htm > > I see two problems for v3: > > The first one should be easy to solve. v3 has no method > > getVertexCount() and no > getVertex(i) > > for the polylines. But v3 has getPath() instead that should do the > same thing in this case. > > The second problem is that v3 still misses the promised "library of > spherical geometry" as an extra module. [1] > > So there are no methods > > latRadians() > lngRadians() > > for the bearing. This is a work that has to be done for oneself.
There are lots of places to get solutions to both those problems, I'm pretty sure they are both addressed by various examples I have done (at http://www.geocodezip.com), they just aren't all together in one place. My understanding (I am not associated with google or part of the API team) is v3 is being designed as a "light-weight mobile" version of the mapping API (my translation), so it probably will never be as full- featured as v2. -- Larry > > [1] This plan was made public > here:http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api/msg/87ac28c52c1c1865 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
