> What is the optimal number of markers in a map size of 778x640 with zoom > level 13.
Performance degrades as markers are added. Some browsers and devices do better than others. Acceptable performance is completely subjective, if you will be having a lot of interaction with the map your requirement may be more stringent than if it were a fairly static display. So it's your decision. Most folk seem to feel that more than a couple of hundred is unacceptable. Visible clutter on the map increases as you place more markers, the user is less able to take in the information at a glance. Small maps and/or large or varied marker icons may exaggerate the problem. It's subjective, so that's your decision. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
