On Mar 3, 4:07 am, Ben Appleton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, what do you mean by 'top'? In some previous api version the z-index was equal to pixel value of 'top' position of the marker. That was clever. Actually my idea is based on that. Relative z-index works only if the internal z-index goes one step per pixel. However the z-index formula should be published as it was with v2. > Why should that be a function of the marker's height? Right. Marker height is not a parameter in this issue. Forget it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
