On Mar 16, 6:03 pm, Scott H <[email protected]> wrote: > I am working on migrating my API v2 code to v3. My mapping solution > requires a good amount of markers to go on the map at one time and, with > version 2, I utilized the MarkerLight. This offered MUCH better performance > because it was merely adding an image overlay onto the map without all the > weight of other objects info. > > Looking at version 3, it appears that Google has really tried to solve the > need for using extensions like MarkerLight and made the standard markers on > maps much much faster. > > Can anyone confirm this via their experience in loading lots of points onto > a v3 map? I have read the documentation and know it says it works well, but > I am curious of anyone's actual experience with it especially if you went > through a similar transition from v2 to v3. > > Thanks!
Google has solved the visual aspect but it still has way to many redundant event listeners. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
