On Mar 19, 6:25 pm, Greg Borbonus <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using the example you showed me in your last reply, but with a > different map(this one is same type of map, just different, city). > > check out
http://greg.prowebconcepts.com/testing2.kml That file is 5 MB. It takes time to download and parse it. > (generated same way > as the original testing3.kml that you worked on before). > > I am using your example to process that file in http://greg.prowebconcepts.com/testing2.html > > Funny thing is, I only have an issue with the slow load time, when > I'm loading the map for the first time ever. The file is served from the browser cache after that. > > Is this due to google? Are they somehow using a cache'd copy of the > file or something? Nope. With geoxml3 everything is processed in the browser. The advantage of geoxml3 is that it gives you access to the polygons as native v3 polygons, the disadvantage is that it suffers from the same performance problems as native v3 polygons. KmlLayer (or FusionTablesLayer), render the polygons as tiles, so they load faster, but you can't add mouseovers (at least yet). -- Larry > > Thank you, > Greg Borbonus > *nix System Administrator > [email protected] > > On 3/19/2011 1:36 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 10:27 am, Greg Borbonus<[email protected]> wrote: > >> hey Guys, > > >> I'm just looking for a thinking out of the box method for this > >> problem. > > >> I'm running into an issue where the kml file is 5.7 MB, and I use a > >> mysql query to pull the kml info out and put it in a file form so > >> the map can load it. > > Is this the same map as you are referring to in this thread: > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/browse_frm/threa... > > >> The query runs almost instantaneous, but the map takes quite a > >> while to load. > > > How are you loading the kml in the map of concern? > > >> I was hoping that someone here might have a solution for me. > > >> My initial thoughts are: > > >> Use a query to pull combined results. for example: > > >> poly 1, 2 and 3 all combined to show as one poly. > > >> When the user Zooms into a level that a more detailed poly can be > >> shown, it loads just that poly. > > >> Any thoughts? > > Use KmlLayer or FusionTablesLayer (assuming you don't have > > requirements for mouseovers). > > > -- Larry > > >> -- > >> Thank you, > >> Greg Borbonus > >> *nix System Administrator > >> [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
