Have you considered using Fusion Tables? Combined with the new dynamic styling API, you could style polygons on the fly: http://googlegeodevelopers.blogspot.com/2011/05/turn-up-power-of-your-fusion-tables.html
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:36 AM, geo12345 <[email protected]> wrote: > There doesn't seem to be much up-take in my question so maybe I should > re-phrase: > > I'm using precooked colored kml layers (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, > indigo, violet) because parsing the polygon data on the browser would take > forever > the polygon data is approx 30 MB in total. > > This has the limitation that we can't dynamically color-code the polygons. > We can't dynamically change the balloon text. > > Maybe if the polygon data were much smaller eg 60 KB it would be possible > to handle client side using eg geoxml3 > > My question is: has anyone else taken the approach of predefining a limited > set of colored kml layers and rendering reports with this set of regions? > > Or would an alternative be to simplify the polygon shapes such that they > are much smaller and handle client side with the advantage of changing the > balloon text on the fly? > > I am interested to hear what existing successful projects have done > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > -- http://twitter.com/broady -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
