its all about the map size, map size of 1920*1080 and bigger need some times to load but overall V3 is way faster then v2
On 22 Jul., 17:22, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 22, 11:00 am, 123gotoandplay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I am converting my maps form v2 to v3 but i notice v3 is a whole lot slower. > > am i correct? > > The design goals as I understand them for v3 were to make it smaller > and quicker than v2 (mainly to make it usable on mobile browsers). > > I haven't seen any obvious performance degradation with v3, but I > haven't done any testing real performance testing either. > > Perhaps you could share the two pages you are comparing so you can get > some feedback. > > A lot of the "built-in" functionality of v2 was left to the developer > to implement, so it is possible that your implementation could be > optimized as well. > > > do you have some similar experience? > > No. > > -- Larry > > > > > > > > > > > regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
