The light weight xml files aren't indexable because tag and attribute names are arbitrary, i.e they can mean everything and nothing. Nowadays search engines aren't able to solve this problem.
That's probably the main reason why Google doesn't like xml. So you'd have to wait for usable semantic search engines. Meanwhile you may use the fatter KML if you want your files to be indexed. On Aug 12, 11:44 pm, Christopher Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > hey all, > > i > usedhttp://code.<http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/pl...> > google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/places-autocomplete.html<http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/pl...> > > great but doesn't search, or auto complete places that i have inside my xml. > > can these organisations <placemarks><name>, <address><description. be > included in the autocomplete? > > cant find places i know are in my xml from the search box by just using > keywords. > > thanks > > chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
