I've made a test using MarkerCluster and the speed has increased a
lot!
The only item working is "alojamientos"
http://grancanaria.com/patronato_turismo/fileadmin/mapaGlobal/mapa_v5.php

regards,
Miguel

On Aug 19, 4:03 pm, Miguel Domínguez Matos <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't avoid caching but it takes some time to load and some times
> markers don't load ( at all or at certain zoom levels ).
> I found a very interesting link where you can compare load times of
> each method, and KML is the slower one with difference. The first time
> it takes a few seconds to load, the it seems to be cached, but if you
> refresh the page it takes again a few seconds to load kml markers.
>
> http://gmaps-samples-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/toomanymarkers/tooma...
>
> On Aug 19, 3:55 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 19, 7:44 am, Miguel Domínguez Matos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > There was a mistake and I related both problems.
> > > Exactly, as you reported, the markers directory was missing. When the
> > > API tried to get the icons it showed the blue ones instead. But the
> > > blue icons were showing incorrectly as reported.
> > > Now, with custom markers "alive" again, everything works fine.
> > > Now we are planning to move out from KML because it is very
> > > inefficient and takes a lot of time to load.
>
> > KmlLayer (and FusionTablesLayer) should load more quickly and perform
> > better than equivalent numbers of native gmaps markers/polygons/
> > polylines for large numbers of objects since they generate tiles at
> > google's servers.  There is the overhead of generating the tiles, but
> > they will be cached (unless you use cache busting techniques).
>
> > YMMV.
>
> >   -- Larry
>
> > > Thanks for your help! ( I hate this stupid mistakes! )
>
> > > On Aug 19, 3:22 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 19, 5:55 am, Miguel Domínguez Matos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > We have a map working fine for some time but since a few weeks we are
> > > > > having some problems.
> > > > > The map get the markers from a KML, wich have custom markers using
> > > > > different colors.
> > > > > Now, the custom markers are not working anymore and all the markers
> > > > > are the same ( the default blue one ).
> > > > > Moreover, you know that the map loads as a grid. Each "square" is an
> > > > > image area. Now, it only show markers for certain areas. Some times
> > > > > the markers don't load at all ( this is a problem we had before ).
> > > > > Since first time we were having problems with markers and kml as we
> > > > > were early adopters of v3 api, wich I think it was not enough tested
> > > > > to launch as production. KML is really slow system and I think we
> > > > > should rewrite some things to have it working right.
> > > > > You can see the map 
> > > > > here:http://www.grancanaria.com/patronato_turismo/Maps-of-Gran-Canaria.335...
> > > > > Try to click in "accomodation" or "beaches" for example.
>
> > > > How about golf?
> > > > This icon doesn't 
> > > > exist:http://www.netfactory.es/marcadores_mapa_ptgc/golf.png
> > > > Beaches (playas), this icon doesn't 
> > > > exist:http://www.netfactory.es/marcadores_mapa_ptgc/playas.png
>
> > > >    -- Larry
>
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Miguel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

Reply via email to